Introduction
The 1996 Polaris SL 780 is a powerful personal watercraft that offers thrilling performance on the water. With its impressive specifications and sleek design, this watercraft became a popular choice among water sports enthusiasts. In this article, we will explore the various specifications of the 1996 Polaris SL 780, including its engine, speed, dimensions/weight, and other notable features.
Engine
The engine is the heart of any watercraft, and the 1996 Polaris SL 780 boasts a high-performance powerplant. Here are the specifications related to its engine:
Engine Type | Two-Stroke |
Displacement | 779 cc |
Cylinder Configuration | In-line |
Cooling System | Water-cooled |
Fuel Type | Regular Unleaded |
Fuel Capacity | 15 gallons (56.8 liters) |
Speed
The 1996 Polaris SL 780 is designed to deliver exhilarating speed and performance on the water. Here are the speed-related specifications:
Top Speed | 55 mph (88.5 km/h) |
Acceleration (0-30 mph) | 3.5 seconds |
Dimensions/Weight
Understanding the dimensions and weight of a watercraft is essential for maneuverability and transportation. Here are the specifications related to the 1996 Polaris SL 780’s dimensions and weight:
Length | 108 inches (274.3 cm) |
Width | 43 inches (109.2 cm) |
Height | 38 inches (96.5 cm) |
Weight | 600 lbs (272.2 kg) |
Other Specifications
In addition to the engine, speed, and dimensions/weight, the 1996 Polaris SL 780 also offers various other notable specifications:
Seating Capacity | 2 persons |
Storage Capacity | 10.8 gallons (40.9 liters) |
Hull Material | Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic (FRP) |
Color Options | Red, Yellow, Blue |
Conclusion
The 1996 Polaris SL 780 is a remarkable personal watercraft that offers impressive performance and specifications. With its powerful engine, thrilling speed, and sleek design, it continues to be a favorite among water sports enthusiasts. Whether you’re looking for an exciting ride or a reliable watercraft for leisurely cruising, the 1996 Polaris SL 780 is a fantastic choice that will not disappoint.
0 Comments